Lesson 3 / 31
LangChain vs LlamaIndex: Which to Use When
Choose by the shape of your problem, or combine them.
Orchestration versus data
LangChain is strongest at composing steps: prompt → model → parser pipelines, routing, tools, agents and (with LangGraph) stateful workflows. LlamaIndex is strongest at getting your data into the model: many data loaders, flexible chunking into nodes, several index types, retrievers, rerankers and query engines tuned for question answering over documents. They overlap (both do RAG and agents) and can be mixed, for example a LlamaIndex retriever used inside a LangChain chain. Pick the one whose abstractions match your main problem, keep your own code thin around it, and avoid mixing two frameworks without a reason.
A rough decision guide
Starting points only; both libraries keep adding features.
Main need Lean toward
Chat app: prompts, tools, routing, streaming LangChain (+ LangGraph for state)
Q&A over many files with rich indexing options LlamaIndex
Multi-step agent with branching and human review LangGraph
Simple one-call app provider SDK directly
Unsure prototype the same 10 questions in both and compareQuick check: Which is LlamaIndex strongest at?
- Managing GPUs
- Training base models
- Rendering web pages
- Loading, indexing and querying your own data
Answer
Loading, indexing and querying your own data — Its abstractions are built around documents, nodes, indexes and query engines.