Lesson 10 / 26
Stakeholders and Ethical Dilemmas
Identify who is affected, including people who never use the system, and weigh trade-offs openly.
Think beyond the user
A hiring screener affects applicants who never chose to use it. A support bot affects agents whose jobs change. A recommender affects communities. List every affected group, ask what each gains and risks, and notice whose voice is missing. Real dilemmas arise when goals conflict: accuracy vs explainability, personalisation vs privacy, efficiency vs jobs, automation vs human judgement. There is rarely a perfect answer; the aim is a reasoned, documented, reviewable choice made by accountable people.
A stakeholder table
Fill it for every high-impact use case. The "Voice" column forces you to say how that group is heard.
Group Benefit Risk Voice
Applicants faster response unfair screening appeal route + human review
Recruiters less manual sorting over-trusting scores training, override button
Hiring managers better shortlists missing good candidates quarterly sample audit
Society/regulators consistent process systematic bias published summary, auditsQuick check: Who might be affected by an AI hiring screener besides its users?
- Job applicants who are screened by it
- Nobody
- Only the developers
- Only the cloud provider
Answer
Job applicants who are screened by it — The people the system makes decisions about are stakeholders even if they never use it.